BEND OVER INDIA —-ITS TIME TO GO PINK

THE JUDGEMENT FACTS AND FICTION

The Indian Supreme Court has overturned the repeal of section 377 of the Indian Penal Code While criminalizing gay sex is clearly unconstitutional and most Indians yours truly included belive that consenting adults should be given the freedom to do what they want with whom they want in the privacy of their homes.However because of the way the law is structured in India the Supreme Court Judgement was TECHNICALLY CORRECT Heres why.Very few in the Indian or international media have actually read section 377

THIS IS THE INFAMOUS SECTION 377. Unnatural offences: Whoever voluntarily has carnal intercourse against the order of nature with any man, woman or animal,shall be punished with imprisonment for life,or with imprisonment of either description for term which may extend to ten years,and shall also be liable to fine.Explanation:Penetration is sufficient to constitute the carnal intercourse necessary to the offense described in this section.

It effectively makes BOTH CONSENSUAL AND NON CONSENSUAL SEX A CRIMINAL OFFENSE In other words it does not distinguish between the two.It also makes BESTIALITY  a crime which no one seems to talk about Striking 377 makes bestiality legal in India (not that anyone has served a life term for screwing his dog or sheep ).Stretching things a bit even oral sex between a husband and wife comes under 377 and a perfectly heterosexual couple could technically be booked under 377

The point is ITS A SILLY OUTDATED LAW NO ONE TAKES SERIOUSLY

The main  point is if 377 is wiped off the books NON CONSENSUAL SEX OR MALE RAPE OR SODOMY BECOMES LEGAL IN INDIA.Hence the Supreme Court has rightly REFUSED to declare section 377 unconstitutional and asked Indian Parliament to amend the law.The media both Indian and International have gone to town about GAY SEX BEING ILLEGAL in India

Here is a living example of WHY the Supreme Court was right

A BJP minister in the Madya Pradesh Government Raghavjee was caught sodomizing his servant

Now in this case the sex was CLEARLY NON CONSENSUAL In other words the servant was RAPED.If the relevant section is taken off the law books people like Raghavjee go scot-free although in his case he was clearly raping his probably heterosexual servant.There is a powerful and youngish gay Indian film producer  If he forces young actors to have sex with him in return for casting them (casting couch ) he could get away  scott free if section 377 is wiped off the law books

Hence the Supreme Court decision is right

INDIAN GAY MOVEMENT SEEMS TO BE LEAD BY INDIANS  —-OR IS THERE SOMETHING WE DONT KNOW

The US and European Movements are clearly lead by and or sponsored by Jews See Here A more scholarly expose of the Jewish involvement in the Gay movement and other “PROGRESSIVE MOVEMENTS” is made by Professor Kevin Mc Donald in his book The Culture of Critique: An Evolutionary Analysis of Jewish Involvement in Twentieth-Century Intellectual and Political Movements which can be reviewed and bought here and Here by Indian readers (Kindle edition for just Rs 112 )

Strangely Jewish pro gay “activists” who are always around in  any “LGBT” movement arent visible in India.Maybe they know what the REAL INDIA thinks and dont want to let India in on the secret of who is behind the fag movement

THE MEDIA AND THE GAY MOVEMENT

Unlike in the US and Europe where Jews are overtly  leading the gay movement the Indian movement doesn’t have any OVERT JEWISH INFLUENCE Whether they are covertly funding or in other ways aiding the gay movement in India is also not clear.The Kosher Indian media and the GLOBLALISED INDIAN “INTELLECTUALS” have gone out whole hog in criticising the Supreme Court for its judgement.No attempt was made to actually read out the section and understand the issue It became a GAY  LOVE FEST The Supreme Court was mindlessly pilloried

The whole of last night you could not open any English or Hindi News channel without some garishly painted gay activist shrilling down inane rubbish at you There were a few sober and lucid comments by Indian gays like Wendell Rodricks  and Vikram Seth which made their points soberly and pointedly.The fact is article 377 is so outdated and irrelevant that its existence is just a technicality.Not a  SINGLE GAY PERSON HAS BEEN CONVICTED under 377 in the 150 years it has been in the law books.Raghavjee was naturally ecstatic when the Judgement came out He could now play the
INNOCENT GAY VICTIM

IS LEGALIZING  GAY MARRIAGE THE NEXT STEP??

The gay movement which SEEMS totally Indian  has now realised it strength and is trying to go the next step in the Gay movements holy grail Gay Marriage.The  Media will blindly jump in support as if legalizing gay sex and legalizing gay marriage are one and the same thing

In fact in a March 2013 article in the Times of India titled Indian marriage laws not as knotty as US’s the article makes the point that Indian marriage laws (for Hindus at least) are GENDER NEUTRAL The journalist jumps to the conclusion that the authors of the 1950s Hindu Marriage Act QUOTE  had shown great vision by keeping it gender neutral and saving the ruling party of the headache to garner enough support in Parliament to pass an amendment to the definition of marriage. END QUOTE.With  the Indian media trying to be in line with global trends slowly going the pro gay marriage way will Gay marriage be the NEXT BIG THING IN INDIA??

AND INDIAN “GAY TOURISM ” IS GOING TO BE AFFECTED —–SILLY ME I DIDNT EVEN KNOW INDIA HAD GAY TOURISM

For a clutch of travel agencies catering exclusively to LGBT tourists, the Supreme Court verdict on Section 377 of IPC has come as a rude shock. Agencies like Pink Vibgyor, Pink Escapes, Indjapink and Out Journeys have been in operation for the past two to three years now, and cater largely to a foreign LGBT clientele. They are now pessimistic about business and the perception of India as a tourist destination abroad.

Abhinav Goel of Out Journeys said that the SC move would have a “distinct impact” on business. “We got a lot of business on the basis of the 2009 high court ruling. International tourists are strong believers in how the politics and governance of a country shape society. They won’t spend their money where they feel unwelcome. Business would have boomed had the Supreme Court given a positive order,” he says. More

WHAT NEXT SHEEP TOURISM OR MOTHER F@KERS TOURS OF INDIA???

Advertisements