This is an article from the Occidental Observer by Dr Andrew Joyce Source

Reflections on the History of the Jewish Hoax

The 19th-century humorist Josh Billings once wrote that “there is no greater evidence of superior intelligence than to be surprised at nothing.” Demonstrating its superior intelligence on Jewish matters, few events shocked the Alt Right less than the recent arrest of a Jewish teenager in Israel for hoax bomb threats against Jewish community centers in the United States, Australia, and New Zealand. Although we are now some weeks removed from the epicenter of this hoax, the sheer scale of its attending political and media hype are deeply significant and deserve further discussion and contextualization. Of particular interest are the actions and posturing of the Anti-Defamation League, shameless in its immediate assertion that the perpetrator was a White anti-Semite, again demonstrating great tenacity in the exercise of its considerable political and cultural influence. Employing the flimsiest of narratives, underpinned by an equally suspect “history of persecution,” the ADL was able to disseminate the myth of Jewish victimhood in the media, secure top-level consultation with the FBI, and even publicly chide the President of the United States for his “inadequate” response. In particular, Trump’s refusal to automatically assume that the bomb threats were a “hate crime” was met with bitter rebukes from several Jewish organizations.

After the “US-Israeli” culprit was apprehended, the naive might have expected some humility and soul-searching from these groups. Yet, in a development that will again fail to surprise the Alt Right, the ADL was unapologetic and intransigent. With extreme arrogance, the organization issued a statement reading: “While the details of this crime remain unclear, the impact of this individual’s actions is crystal clear: these were acts of anti-Semitism.”

Although Jews themselves seem to have learned little from the episode, it does provide us with some food for thought. From beginning to end, the episode perfectly revealed in microcosm the Jewish relationship to anti-Semitism, the construction of narratives through which Jews understand themselves, and the importance of myth and deception in sustaining Jewish identity. In short, the episode revealed the core of a singular phenomenon — the quintessential ‘Jewish hoax.’ Since no language better grapples with the concept of the compound noun than German, we may even coin a term for this phenomenon — the Judenscherz.

The Judenscherz

For many centuries Jews have engaged in the construction of false narratives that act to reinforce in-group identity while simultaneously disarming or disinhibiting out groups.The most powerful of these narratives can be grouped under the broad heading of the ‘victimhood narrative.’ Victimhood narratives are important in a group context because, even though they may be in large part fictional, they allow the problems andchallenges of the group to be blamed on an outgroup, absolving the ingroup of agency in its own misfortunes and thus obviating the need for internal change.A further use of victimhood narratives is that they nurture the building of resentments, which can in turn provide the impetus and energy for aggressive acts against competitors. Although many ethnic and national groups have flirted with victimhood narratives, Jews are distinctive in their particularly strong aversion to changing their own version of victimhood. They have thus repeatedly had recourse to victimhood narratives throughout their history, and have adopted a unique worldview in which the entire non-Jewish world, the goyim, is presented as hostile — a case of ‘Jews versus the World.’ Most remarkable of all, Jews have been unique in their success in persuading competitors and opposing groups to adopt the Jewish victimhood narrative,disarming and disabling the more natural instinct of non-Jews to compete.

For these and lesser reasons, Jewish culture has come to master the art of the victimhood narrative and one often finds it remarked that the entire history of Jews is a history of constant suffering — the “lachrymose history of the Jews.” Although general acceptance of this over-arching historical narrative is a fairly recent development — not much older than half a century, its now mainstream position stands stubbornly opposed to overwhelming evidence that Jews have been a privileged, protected, and economically and politically powerful group throughout recorded history. Indeed, one struggles to find a group of comparable size, at any place and in any point in time, enjoying the same level of wealth and influence. The most obvious weakness of contemporary academic and cultural treatments of Jewish matters is that they fail to adopt even a remotely critical approach to Jewish narratives. The alleged age-old victimhood of the Jews is simply taken at face value, digested, and deeply internalized, particularly in the West where Whites of Anglo and Germanic lineage have rarely, if ever, adopted a victimhood narrative of their own.

Because the Jewish victimhood narrative is, at heart, a compound of self-interested fabrications, the details that punctuate this over-arching narrative are themselves a rich constellation of exaggerations, bluffs, swindles, and hoaxes. As explored in detail in a previous article, perhaps the earliest example of the Judenscherz is the Book of Exodus, an effort at refuting a Greek and Egyptian consensus on the undesirable behaviors of the Jewish populations in their midst. In any event, the Book of Exodus was, and remains, crucial in providing a foundation myth for Jewish victimhood narratives and thus a foundation for the Jewish hoax. The putative ‘liberation’ of enslaved and persecuted Hebrews from Egypt is commemorated by Judaism every year, in the form of the Pesach, or Passover festival. Historian Paul Johnson remarks that Exodus “became an overwhelming memory” and “gradually replaced the creation itself as the central, determining event in Jewish history.”[1] Exodus has a power that exists independently from the trappings of religious myth, acting through the centuries as a defining narrative of victimhood, group vindication, and self-validation. Exodus is a foundation upon which Jewish identity is built.

It is interesting that Josephus, the first Jewish ‘historian’ to attempt an intellectual defense of the Exodus narrative, provides us with another very early Judenscherz. In one of his more famed works, Wars of the Jews (c. 70 A.D), Josephus recounted the 66 A.D. Alexandrian riots. According to this sanitized and embellished account some 50,000 Jews were killed (Jos., Wars, Book 2). The relevant sections of Josephus are worth citing directly:

The sedition of the people of the place against the Jews was perpetual. … They were also permitted not only to kill them, but to plunder them of what they had, and to set fire to their houses…They were destroyed unmercifully; and this their destruction was complete, some being caught in the open field, and others forced into their houses, which houses were first plundered of what was in them, and then set on fire by the Romans; wherein no mercy was shown to the infants, and no regard had to the aged; but they went on in the slaughter of persons of every age, till all the place was overflowed with blood, and fifty thousand of them lay dead upon heaps. … And this was the miserable calamity which at this time befell the Jews at Alexandria.

One of the more noteworthy aspects of the Josephus account is the emphasis on alleged external agitation. The animosity against the Jews in this narrative does not arise in any way from Jewish behaviors, but rather from apparently spontaneous, unwarranted, and perpetual “sedition of the people of the place against the Jews.” The violence is described as savage and sadistic — infants and the elderly are murdered in brutal fashion — and damage to property is alleged to have been extensive. Finally, the reported death toll is both remarkably ‘neat’ and remarkably high.

The narrative of Josephus was entirely fictional. Firstly, the full context of interethnic hostility in the region is missing. Not only were the Jews of Alexandria at that time busily engaged in a military and diplomatic conspiracy against Roman rule, but their economic affairs and political power were also a cause for significant disquiet among the non-Jewish populace. Louis Feldman concedes in his Jew and Gentile in the Ancient World: Attitudes and Interactions from Alexander to Justinian (1993) that most of the hatred against Jews was “due to the importance of the positions occupied by Jews in the vast bureaucracy … especially as tax collectors.”[2] Feldman adds that Jews in Alexandria had secured a dominant position at the upper levels of the Alexandrian shipping industry, as well as monopolies in the sale and traffic of several products. In 38 A.D. a protest against Jewish power had been provoked by “displays of Jewish wealth and power,” and by “the privileged position and influence of the Jews.”[3] Jews were also accused of dual loyalty. The extremely high international level of Jewish influence during this period was demonstrated when the Roman governor of Alexandria, Flaccus, was recalled, exiled, and then executed by order of the degenerate Emperor Caligula for allowing the protest to proceed.[4] The affair would be immortalized in yet another masterwork of Judenscherz, the ancient Jewish philosopher Philo’s In Flaccum, which used the fate of Flacco as a veiled threat to non-Jews considering a challenge to Jewish power.

The level of violence recounted by Josephus was also a total fabrication, with no modern historian supporting a death toll even remotely approaching the 50,000 claimed by the Jewish author.[5] In a pattern that would re-emerge in Western Europe in the Middle Ages, evidence shows that the Roman authorities were very much opposed to wholesale action against the Jews, preferring to protect the wealthy community and punish its prior agitations with a half-shekel tax rather than the sword. Jews were seen as too financially useful to be left at the mercy of popular retribution— the recurrent theme of Jewish history in which JEWS MAKE ALLIANCES WITH NON-JEWISH ELITES IN OPPOSITION TO POPULAR INTERESTS. One might then ask why a wealthy and powerful community would, even in ancient times, assert a victimhood narrative. As described above, the Jewish victimhood narrative has a dual function — to reinforce aspects of Jewish identity and to manipulate competitors. In this regard it is interesting to consider the remarks of historian Ellen Birnbaum on Philo’s In Flaccum: “Philo may, on the one hand, wish to bolster the spirit of his fellow Jews; on the other hand, he may wish to sound a warning to Gentiles.”[6]

Early narratives like Exodus and the works of Josephus and Philo provided the template for later interpretations and revisions of certain historical and political realities. For example, references to these earlier ‘persecutions’ provided a false justification for the self-segregating practices of the Jews that were more palatable, especially to outsiders, than frank admissions that Jews felt themselves superior to the nations they dwelt among. We find this particularly during the Middle Ages in explanations for the ghetto experience. Indeed, one of the most remarkable omissions from the majority of mainstream accounts of the Medieval Jewish experience is the very privileged position of Jews during this period. To be clear, Jews had no automatic right of settlement in Europe. This was an age long before the concept of ‘immigration’ distorted the human instinct, and the settlement of foreigners in one’s midst was still perceived as usurpation of more or less severity depending on the numbers involved. Jews were able to form settlements in Europe only because they were given assistance by the Christian Church in the form of Papal decrees that approved their residence, as well as granting them freedom from efforts at conversion and protection against ‘maltreatment.’ Without a Christian theology that taught that Jews possessed a special role in the history of humankind, it is unlikely that Jews would have been able to settle in Europe in the manner they eventually did. (Some of the most influential treatises in this regard were formulated by Bernard of Clairvaux and Thomas Aquinas.) We may therefore consider the Christian settlement decrees to be the primary privilege that underlay the rise of the Jews in Western Europe in particular.

The Jews of the Middle Ages pleaded persecuted status while simultaneously enjoying unparalleled access to wealth and power. This Judenscherz has been passed down through the centuries and remains in robust condition even today. Jews were entirely dominant during the period. The Jews of France and Germany were allowed to transact business without restriction from the ninth until the eleventh century — three centuries of growth in financial influence during which, in the euphemistic language of Jacob Katz, their “involvement in the provision of credit was considerable.”[7] Jews were allowed complete judicial control over their own communities. Further, as Katz states: “A feature of the high political standing of the Jews was the permission to bear arms … This fact is perhaps to be viewed less as providing a means to self-protection than as a sign of political status. As a result of the permission, the Jews ranked with the knights and the feudatories who belonged to the upper strata of medieval society.”[8] Jews stood over the masses, working solely for their exploitation. The Jews of the Middle Ages engaged in no productive labor, almost all of them living parasitically from moneylending. Katz writes that; “The picture of the Jew waiting at home for the Gentile to come to borrow money or to pay a debt is a realistic one.”[9]

The reality of the tradition of Jewish power and economic exploitation during this period has been smothered by an extremely effective Judenscherz based, like the accounts of Josephus and Philo, on fictionalized accounts of extreme violence. Historian Jonathan Elukin writes that “violence is traditionally perceived to be at the core of the Jewish experience in Medieval Europe.”[10] Like the earlier accounts, we see multiple references to spontaneous “rising levels of anti-Jewish polemic, accusations of atrocities, physical attacks, and finally expulsion.”[11] However, contrary to the Judenscherz, violence was in fact extremely rare, and even its alleged high point, the Second Crusade, “brought with it little actual violence against European Jewry.”[12] The much-lamented ‘blood libel,’ supposedly the arch-provocation for much of this alleged violence, was in reality so sparse and ineffectual against entrenched Jewish power that “most Jews lived their entire lives without direct experience of those accusations.”[13]

All of this is of course very reminiscent of the Judenscherz of the Russian pogroms of the late nineteenth and early twentieth century, also of alleged atrocities committed by the German armed forces during World War Two. In these instances, allegations of extreme violence played a key role in galvanising Jewish cohesion and manipulating non-Jews — in the case of the Russian ‘pogroms,’ manipulating Western Whites into accepting millions of Jewish economic migrants masquerading as ‘refugees.’ Then, as during the current invasion of Muslims and Africans, EUROPEANS WERE INUNDATED WITH STORIES OF SUFFERING, RESULTING IN AN OUTPOURING OF EMPATHY. During a British parliamentary consultation on the ‘pogroms’ in 1905, a Rabbi Michelson claimed that “the atrocities had been so fiendish that they could find no parallel even in the most barbarous annals of the most barbarous peoples.”[14] The New York Times reported that during the 1903 Kishinev pogrom: “Babies were literally torn to pieces by the frenzied and bloodthirsty mob.”[15] A common theme in most contemporary atrocity stories was the brutal rape of Jewish women, with most reports including mention of breasts being hacked off and mothers were raped alongside their daughters. Modern-day Jewish intellectuals and academics play a key role in the Judenscherz by repeating, reinforcing, and affirming it. For example, Joseph Brandes in his 2009 Immigrants to Freedom alleges that mobs “threw women and children out of the windows” of their homes, and that “heads were battered with hammers, nails were driven into bodies, eyes were gouged out … and petroleum was poured over the sick found hiding in cellars and they were burned to death.”[16]

It was only in the 2000s that the Judenscherz of the Russian pogroms came under systematic attack when Catholic scholar John Doyle Klier (1944–2007) began publishing on the subject, in turn revealing the mechanical and procedural elements in the development of a Jewish hoax. Whether we are talking about the ancient pamphlets of Philo, the tomes of Josephus, or the activities of Jewish scribes in the Middle Ages, control of media and the means of communication are crucial. Klier pointed out that the pogrom hoax gained momentum in the West mainly because the then-influential British Daily Telegraph was at that time Jewishowned, and was particularly “severe” in its reports on Russian treatment of Jews prior to 1881. According to Klier, one of its specialities was the spreading of “sensationalized accounts of mass rape.”[17] Other influential reporting came from a “Special Correspondent” for the Jewish World Klier remarked that the alleged itinerary of this ‘journalist’ around Russia “raises intriguing problems for the historian.”[18] While his itinerary of travel is described as “plausible,” most of his accounts are “flatly contradicted by the archival record.” His claim that twenty rioters were killed during a pogrom in Kishinev in 1881 was proven to be a fabrication by records which show that in that city, at that time, “there were no significant pogroms and no fatalities.” Furthermore, Klier argued that the atrocity stories compiled by the Jewish World correspondent must be treated with “extreme caution.” The reporter “portrayed the pogroms dramatically, as great in scale and inhuman in their brutality. He reported numerous accounts where Jews were burned alive in their homes while the authorities looked on.” There are hundreds of instances where he references the murder of children, the mutilation of women, and the biting off of fingers.

Klier stated that “the author’s most influential accounts, given their effect on world

-opinion, were his accounts of the rape and torture of girls as young as ten or twelve.”  Klier found that “Jewish intermediaries who were channeling pogrom reports abroad were well aware of the impact of reports of rape, and it featured prominently in their accounts.” All such accounts were wholesale fabrications. Provoked by atrocity propaganda, the British Government undertook its own independent investigation.  The most notable aspect of the independent inquiry was the outright denial of mass rape . In January 1882, Consul-General Stanley objected to all of the details contained within reports published by the media, mentioning in particular the unfounded “accounts of the violation of women.” He further stated that his own investigations revealed that there had been no incidences of rape during the Berezovka pogrom, that violence was rare, and that much of the disturbance was restricted to property damage. ViceConsul Law, another independent investigator, reported that he had visited Kiev and Odessa, and could only conclude that “I should be disinclined to believe in any stories of women having been outraged in those towns.” Another investigator, Colonel Francis Maude, visited Warsaw and said that he could “not attach any importance” to atrocity reports emanating from that city. When these reports were made public, states Klier, they represented “a serious setback for the protest activities” of Jewish organizations.” The Times of London was one of the foremost propaganda merchants during this period, a fact that is hardly surprising given that it was populated by influential Jewish journalists like Lucien Wolf, the anti-Russian foreign affairs ‘expert’ operating behind the scenes of several major newspapers. The Times was forced to backtrack on many of its claims, but responded spitefully by stating that the indignation of the country was still justified even if the atrocities were “the creations of popular fancy” — a retort that is more than a little reminiscent of the ADL’s response to the exposure of the recent bomb threat hoax.

The Consuls were outraged by the response of the Times and the ongoing influence of the Jewish hoax. Stanley reiterated the fact that his intensive investigations, which he carried out at great personal cost with a serious leg injury, illustrated that “The Times’ accounts of what took place at each of those places contains the greatest exaggerations, and that the account of what took place at some of those places is absolutely untrue.” Enraged by Judenscherz circulating in Britain and America, Stanley “went right to the top,” interviewing state rabbis and asking for evidence and touring pogrom sites. In Odessa, where a wealth of atrocity stories had originated, he was able to confirm “one death, but no looting of synagogues or victims set alight.” There was no evidence that a single rape had taken place.


DESPITE STANLEY’S BEST EFFORTS THE JEWISH NARRATIVE REMAINED UNALTERABLY ATTACHED IN WESTERN PERCEPTIONS OF THE ‘POGROMS, and the ‘pogroms’ themselves take their place alongside a litany of other Jewish hoaxes in the Western imagination – an imagination in which the Jewish victimhood narrative still holds great sway. It is difficult to formulate effective responses to such frauds. Exposures of individual hoaxes are almost inevitably smothered by the more visible, audible, and oft-repeated tales of the Jewish propaganda moguls. As elating as it can be to see one of these fakes exposed, and the bomb threat hoax is certainly no exception, it should be understood that it is the narrative of Jewish victimhood is what underpins and supports the collective strength of the Judenscherz. Indeed, these phenomena are now mutually reinforcing – hoaxes derive their credibility and initial believability from an alleged history of persecution — a history that is itself built on hoaxes. The government, the media, many members of the public, and even many Jews believed that the recent bomb threats were real because they have literally been indoctrinated in the idea that Jews are constantly under threat of violence — a threat of violence that is said to have long historical precedent.

Ultimately, the key to bringing down the phenomenon of the Jewish hoax will not lie in the exposure of single incidents or historical events, but in the conclusive elimination of the narrative of Jewish victimhood.  Jews are a powerful, protected, and very privileged elite— and they always have been. Their appeal to victimhood status would be laughable but for the fact it is one of the key strategies behind our decline

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment


Rahul Gandhi with good friend David Miliband  Modi with Netanyahu

Bengal CM Mamata Banerjee with Alon Upshitz former Israeli Ambassador ,Orissa CM Naveen  Patnaik with former Israeli Ambassador David Danielli , Rajasthan CM Raje with Israeli Ambassador Carmon

BJP Mossadick Subramanian Swamy,  Congress Mossadick Sashi Tharoor

Project Interchange politicians Jiten Prasad (Congress) Nupur Sharma( BJP )

AJC (American Jewish Congress) “Advocacy ” with GOI

Indias NSA National Security Advisor Ajit Doval went on an all expense paid trip to Israel in 2013 (when he wasnt in Government) The trip was funded by the American Jewish Committee (AJC) via its Project Interchange

On  October , 2015 a 35 member  AJC  American Jewish Council “leadership delegation” met Defense Minister Manohar Parrikar, Foreign Secretary S. Jaishankar, National Security Advisor Ajit Doval, Power Minister Piyush Goyal, and Minority Affairs Minister Najma Heptulla were among the officials with whom the 23-member AJC delegation met.

AJC (American Jewish Congress is not a Government body or a trade body or a Religious body It is a self appointed body which seeks to “represent the Jewish people”

No mention is made of Dovals all expense paid 2013 trip to Israel

ShivPal Singh bropther of Mulayam Singh of the Samajwadi Party visited Israel in 2011

Israeli Embassy Funtion Regulars Subramanian Swamy (with Kirti Azad) Jay Panda with Neeraj Shekar (Ex PM Chandrashekar’s son) Sudhanshu Mittal BJP Spokesman Ram Jethmalani , Soli Sorabjee




All the Ambassador ‘s Men (and Women )

L K Advani, Gaurav Gogoi, Prakash Javdekar (Education Minister) Kapil Mishra Mary Kom


Alka Lamba






Sneaky Little Fellow Arvind Kejriwal and Ashish Khetan with Israeli Ambassador



India-Israel Delegation Visit to Israel Lead by Sajan Jindal
July 18-23, 2010

Jindal a billionaire businessman cum politician sets up  the Jindal Center for Israel Studies #JSIA at his Jindal Global Unniversity


Delegation of “Young Politicians ” to Israel 2012  lead by Conrad Sangma

Sudhir Sharma (Himachal Pradesh), Sanjay Jha (Bihar), Vani Tripathi (BJP member)., P C Vishnunadh (Kerala) and Krishna Byre Gowda (Karnataka)

On 28/9-4/10/2013 a delegation of five Members of Parliament from Lok Sabha visited Israel

Ms. Agatha Sangma RegionalParty Manipur ,  Mr. Ponnam Prabhakar,Telangana Mr. Jose Mani Kerala Congress, Dr. Anup Kumar Saha Bengal CPI, Dr. Chandan Mitra BJP ,


Is India going the JewSa way? It could if we arent careful









Posted in Uncategorized | 1 Comment


Jean-Marie Le Pen was born on 20 June 1928 in La Trinité-sur-Mer , a small seaside village in Brittany, the son of Anne Marie Hervé and Jean Le Pen, a fisherman. He was orphaned at 14 For someone who has never excelled academically he was surprisingly accepted in  the Jesuit school  Collège-Lycée-Prépa Saint-François-Xavier de Vannes which is a preparatory school

How many poor Catholic fishermans sons with no academic talent get into quality Jesuit preparatory schools?

The Jesuit movement was started by Crypto Jews and has always been associated with crypto Judiasm

From there entered the faculty of law in Paris.He became president of the Association corporative des étudiants en droit, an association of law students whose main occupation was to engage in street brawls against the “Cocos” (communists). He was excluded from this organisation in 1951. He took to wearing an eyepatch in the 60s falsely claiming to have lost his eyesight during a political brawl

After receiving his law diploma, he enlisted in the army in the Foreign Legion.In Paris in 1956, he was elected to the National Assembly as a member of Pierre Poujade‘s UDCA populist party. Le Pen, 28 years old, was the youngest member of the Assembly.

In 1960 he married Pierrette Lalanne with whom he had three daughters Marie-Caroline,Yann and Marine  these daughters have given him nine granddaughters.

For someone supposedly so antisemitic women in Le Pens life have had close ties with Jews

Le Pen’s  marriage break up  was somewhat dramatic, with his 49 year old  ex-wife of 25 years posing nude in the French edition of Jew Hugh Hefner Playboy to “ridicule ” him. Equally strangely for such a raging Antisemite Le Pen never uttered a word against the porn industry of Jew Hefner

                                   Playboy Granny Pierrete Le Pen

His political life got better though  Ordre Nouveau (New Order in French) was a far-right movement created on December 15, 1969. The first president was the lawyer Jean-François Galvaire (who worked for Roland Gaucher, a former member of the National Popular Rally) In June 1972, Ordre Nouveau joined with Jean-Marie Le Pen’s movement in the Front National. José Bruneau de La Salle joined the political bureau, while Jean-Claude Nourry, Patrice Janeau and Michel Bodin left the movement.

On October 5, 1972 the Front National was formed.

M Le Pen first ran for president in 1974, winning less than one per cent of the vote in the first round. In 1976 Hubert Lambert-just 42 yers old , heir to a large cement fortune and a generous donor to extreme Right-wing causes died. Lambert changed his will months before his death to make M Le Pen his sole heir. Members of M Lambert’s family challenged the new will but M Le Pen held on to his inheritance, valued at the time at £4 million (probably worth 20 million $ today).There were rumurs that the Lambert family split some much larger unaccounted accounts in Hubert Lamberts name with Le Pen and settled the matter

                                                       Hubert Lambert

Hubert Lambert does look Jewish There is a famous Jewish banking Lambert dynasty  who started out as agents of the Rothschilds Hubert Lambert may be linked to these Lamberts   Lamberts money meant that Le Pen could concentrate full time into politics G–D sent stroke of luck like his Jesuit schooling

Jean Marie Le Pen has repeatedly been accused of making antisemitic remarks Yet the most “antisemitic”thing Jean Marie has said is that the Holocaust is this “I ask myself several questions. I’m not saying the gas chambers didn’t exist. I haven’t seen them myself. I haven’t particularly studied the question. But I believe it’s just a detail in the history of World War II.” He was condemned under the Gayssot Act to pay 1.2 million francs (183,200 euros).

Under Jean-Marie, the FN also transformed into a family business, at one point involving all of his three daughters. Today, only Marine, Yann (Jean-Marie’s second daughter), and the latter’s 25-year-old daughter Marion (also one of the FN’s two members of parliament), are still closely involved in the party organization.

Marine was married in 1995 to Franck Chauffroy, a business executive who worked for the National Front. By Chauffroy, she has three children (Jehanne, Louis, and Mathilde).After her divorce from Chauffroy in 2000, she married Eric Lorio in 2002, the former national secretary of the National Front and a former adviser to the Regional election in Nord-Pas de Calais, whom she also divorced in 2006.

Since 2009, she has been in a relationship with Louis Aliot, whose grandfather was Algerian Jewish. In 2010 she took over the  Front National from daddy Jean Marie Cohencidence

Louis Alliot and Michel Thooris

Michel Thooris who has a Jewish mother is part of the FN’s Central Committee Thooris is also the founder of  Union des Patriotes Francais Juifs, or the Union of French-Jewish Patriots. Aliot, accompanied Thooris on a visit to Israel in 2011 Thooris acknowledges the informal but intriguing ties between his fledgling movement and the FN

Roger Cukierman, head of CRIF, the country’s umbrella organization for Jewish institutions.  announced that Marine Le Pen, unlike her father, was “personally irreproachable” — a remark he quickly walked back in the resulting firestorm of criticism.

But the Le Pen’s Jewish ties just got way stronger in 2013

Marion Jeanne Caroline Maréchal-Le Pen (b 1989) is the , granddaughter of Front national (FN) founder Jean-Marie Le Pen, and niece of current FN president Marine Le Pen.Her mother Yann Le Pen,is  Jean-Marie Le Pen’s second daughter

Marion Marchal Le Pen and her biological Mossad Daddy  Roger Auque

On 7 November 2013, the French weekly news magazine L’Express disclosed the identity of her birth father, Roger Auque, a Mossad agent and investigative journalist who died in September 2014.  He revealed in a book that was published posthumously in 2015 that he had been a Mossad agent.

Jesuit education 4 million euros from a rich heir (who could be Jewish ) a playboy granny , a Jewish boyfriend a Mossad daddy

Cohencidences Cohencidences Cohencidences

Front National is by most accounts a Le Pen family business Le Pen has three daughters and nine grandgaughters

Somehow the daughter with a Jewish partner and the granddaughter with a Mossad father are the Chosen successors




Posted in Uncategorized | 9 Comments


On Jan. 9, bomb threats were called into 16 Jewish Community Centers across the Northwest and South, forcing the evacuation of hundreds.

On Jan. 18, some 30 Jewish institutions in at least 17 states received bomb threats.

On Jan 31, some 17 JCCs across the United States were targeted with bomb threats.

The threats have been called in to JCCs across the country , according to Paul Goldenberg, the director of Secure Community Network — an affiliate of the Jewish Federations of North America that advises Jewish groups and institutions on security.

“It appears to be the same serial caller” as in the prior incidents, Goldenberg told JTA. “The JCCs are very well equipped to handle this,” he said.

Goldenberg said his organization was consulting with federal authorities, including the FBI and the Department of Homeland Security. He said there was no information as to the perpetrator,but noted an increase in social media threats, particularly from the far right.

In many cases Wednesday the callers were live, Goldenberg said, as opposed to the previous threat, when calls were recorded. He said the caller in most cases was a woman, who kept the call brief: leveling the threat and then hanging up.


Given Jewish history of faking ” Anti Semitic” attacks and the reluctance or failure in  tracing the crank caller or callers it would be logical to assume the calls were by  a Jewish person or persons and the JCCs were reluctant to name the crank caller

It seemed as if  the whole farce would play itself out until Trumps 16 Feb Press Conference  where a Hasidic Jewish reporter named  Jake Trux  bought up the crank calls

That’s probably when s  somebody in the Jewish Hype Machine decided to bring on the Anti Semitism

As if on cue the crazy crank caller struck again on 20th February Wave of bomb threats continues against US Jewish community centers On February 20 10 JCCs across the US faced bomb threats

And when it rains “AntiSemitism’ it pours …..On the 20th of February  there was a attack on a Jewish cemetery in St Louis


On 26th a Philadelphia cemetery was vandalized Some tombstones were broken CNN did it’s propaganda piece Turns out  a Catholic cemetery  Holy Redeemer Cemetery was also vandalized in the same city and  33 tombstones were found toppled earlier this month Nobody cared 


Now it turns out the calls are “coordinated” and might come from ‘abroad”

The crank callers who made 73 fake calls have not yet been identified despite the FBI and Homeland Security being on the case Neither are the persons who broke a few tombstones

On 27th Feb CBS had this out




On March 3 the FBI arrested a black man Juan Thomson for sending EIGHT of the bomb threats to the JCCs


Nobody knows or seems interested in knowing who sent the rest of the fake bomb threats or who broke the tombstones

Don”t be surprised if the “investigation” doesn’t conclude Iran or Russia or Syria was behind this

Whats the use of Antisemitism if you cant get something tangible out of it?

A prediction Id made in my previous post seems to be coming true

The whole plan seems to be to infiltrate and reduce the White Nationalist movement into a rabid Black Arab and Muslim hating bunch of thugs while “liberal” Jews will go on “helping” these groups with Open Borders refugee friendly policies etc.

All the while paid jew shills will indulge in silly childish jew baiting in the cyber and real world The jew media will howl in righteous indignation about the rise of “Anti Semitism”

Posted in Uncategorized | 6 Comments



Herman A. Rosenblat was a Polish-Jew who cooked up a completely fake fairy tale about  a girl who passed him food through the barbed-wire fence at  Buchenwal


ww I was sent to the Gas Chamber but it was full! (Irene Weisberg Zisblatt).

Lying Jewess Zisblatt caught lying


Helen Schwartz “By Some Miracle, Water Came Down, Instead of the Gas!”


Surviving with wolves a film based on a similarly titled book by Misha DeFonseca who claimed to have survived the Holocaust TM by living with wolves  The whole story was pardon the pun a pack of lies The movie is still probably showing as a true story By the way Misha isn’t even Jewish a fact that probably angered the Jews the most ………….Imagine a goy sponging of the Shoa




I lived near the Auschwitz crematorium and smelt 24 hours roast chicken The inmates in Auschwitz told me Dont use the soap it could be your mother


Posted in Uncategorized | 2 Comments


Since 1992 the year India established diplomatic ties with Israel there has been a steady process of influencing Indian journalists and Media Owners

This is an INCOMPLETE  list of journalists and media owners who are have either been actively courted or are for ideological reasons shilling for All Judaan Do drop a line with links if u can recall other such journalists

There are more such journalists who however are more discrete and covert about their links and associations

Next time you read any article written or edited by any of these journalists or see a TV report presented or directed remember there could be an agenda behind it




One of the eight Malini Goyal (seventh from left) of the Economic Times has already written her first puff piece Israel a Start Up Oasis in the middle of a war zone

hindol4There’s also Hindol SenGupta  the fat guy (second from right)

rajyadhaksha-8-eco-editors-to-israelThird from left is LiveMint ‘s Niranjan Rajyadhaksha   Here is his puff piece Israel: The start-up nation and beyond


Dainik Bhaskar was declared the world’s 4th largest circulated daily newspaper in 2013-14. Daniel Carmon is Israels Ambassador to India



Rajya Sabha Member of Parliament Leading investor in Arnab Goswami’s new TV  channel “Republic” and a sanctimonious shyster



Shekhar Gupta (born 1957)  is currently working with Business Standard . He was earlier the vice chairman of the India Today Group. Until June 2014, he served 19 years as editor-in-chief of the Indian Express.He also hosts an interview-based television show Walk the Talk on NDTV 24×7. He was awarded the Padma Bhushan by the Indian government in 2009 for his contribution to journalism. Gupta has shilled for Monsanto and Facebook’s Zuckerberg too





Deputy Executive Editor, CNN-News18 Started with Headlines Today (Now India Today) in 2003 In 2011 joined CCTV (China’s external English Language broadcaster) then in 2014 joined CNN TV18




Free AJC sponsored Project Interchange trip to Israel 2016

Deputy Resident Editor & Diplomatic Affairs Editor, The Hindu The #IndianPI16 hashtag stands for Project Interchange 2016




Free AJC sponsored Project Interchange trip to Israel 2016

Currently, she is working with NewX English News Channel as the Assistant Editor of Foreign Affairs. Before joining, News X, she was with Times Now as Deputy Editor.



In 1982, he joined The Telegraph as a sub-editor . In 1987, he became the youngest Assistant Editor in The Statesman’s history.  In 1991, he moved to Delhi with a new assignment as Assistant Editor of The Pioneer, then edited by Vinod Mehta. A year later, in December 1995, he gave up full-time journalism to concentrate on a public career and began to assist L.K. Advani and Atal Bihari Vajpayee in their parliamentary work.

Kanchan Gupta ‘s Kosher Links



Singh returned to India in 1974 to work with The Statesman as a reporter. She joined The Telegraph as a Special Correspondent in 1982. In 1985 and also in 1987 she became the South Asia correspondent of the Sunday Times, London.Subsequently she became a freelancer and started writing for India Today and The Indian Express.

Tavleen Singhs Kosher Links



Ashok Malik is an Indian current affairs columnist who writes for The Times of India, Hindustan Times , The Asian Age, The Pioneer and Tehelka. He has also contributed to international publications such as Forbes and YaleGlobal Online. He’s also an employee of the Ambani Family run   Observer Research Foundation. He is also a fellow at the Australia India Institute  and is associated with the Jewish Lowy Institute .All these  associations  are probably very financially remunarative for Malik

Ashok Malik’s Kosher Links


chandanOn 4-9/10/2013 a delegation of five Members of Parliament from Lok Sabha visited Israel as  part of a program that was jointly organized by the Governance & Public Policy Initiative (GPPI),Centre for Policy Research (CPR) and the Embassy of Israel. Mitra went as a Rajya Sabha Member See his editorial One Raw deal for Israel

The bulk of the funding for the Aspen Institute known in India as Ashoka Aspen is by four Zionist Jewish families  at least two of which (Crown and Pritzker)  were supposed to have had close ties to Kosher Nostra the Jewish Mafia .These four families are the Crown (Krinsky) family , Pritzker family the Reznick family and the Rubenstein family . We know what they say about he who pays the piper …………

                                  ANUJ PODDAR Aspen Institute Global Leadership Network 

Business Head of COLORS Marathi & COLORS Gujarati, Anuj Poddar. With a vision to reposition the regional entertainment space in India, Anuj is turning around the face and driving growth of both channels. He is also responsible for maximising viewership and revenue on the channels. Before taking on his current role, Anuj was Head of Strategy from 2005 to 2013 during which period he

             GOVINDRAJ ETHIRAJ Aspen Institute Global Leadership Network

Govindraj Ethiraj – Co-Founder, Ping Digital Broadcast, Boom Live and IndiaSpend He is also Founder-Editor of the award-winning www.indiaspend.org & www.factchecker.in, a twin public interest journalism effort that uses data to tell stories. IndiaSpend is a member of the Global Investigative Journalism Network (GIJN). the body which “exposed” the Panama Papers He also anchors seasonal shows on Rajya Sabha or RS TV. Previously, he was Founder-Editor in Chief of Bloomberg TV India and  CNBCTV18 Prior to television, he worked in print in The Economic Times, Business World and Business India magazines.

INDRANI BAGCHI   Aspen Institute Global Leadership Network 

Diplomatic Editor, Times of India Earlier, Indrani was associate editor, also covering foreign affairs for India Today & before that The Statesman Indrani has been a Reuters Fellow, in Oxford University (1996).In 2010, Indrani was awarded the Chang Lin-Tien fellowship by the Asia Foundation to study US-China relations at Brookings Institution, Washington DC. Bagchi is followed on twitter by a host of Israeli officials

SUPARNA SINGH Aspen Institute Global Leadership Network 

Head, Convergence and Director – Strategy, NDTV Group Suparna Singh has been with NDTV since 1994. Managing Editor of ndtv.com. In her 20-year-long career in live television, she has created and headed a live news channel and NDTV’s award-winning Promos department. As the editorial and business head of NDTV Convergence, she is responsible for the content and expansion of NDTV’s digital section



Currently with Hindustan Times  (Ronin) Previously with Mail Today, Press Trust of India, Indo-Asian News Service Free AJC sponsored Project Interchange trip to Israel 2016 Accused in the past (2011)of being an ISI shill  Expelled from Pakistan in 2015

                                                SM ASIF PROJECT INTERCHANGE 2011



* Editor, In-Dinon S.M ASIF  also doubles up  as the  National President of the All India Minorities Front (AIMF)


alumni iftiar gilani

Bureau Chief, Kashmir Times (Delhi) son in law of Syed Ali Shah Geelani National Bureau Chief of DNA (Daily News and Analysis) in New Delhi Previously, Gilani has worked with Voice of Germany, Daily Times, The Friday Times (Pakistan), Tehelka and the Kashmir Times.

                                K P NAYAR PROJECT INTERCHANGE 2011

                                                             ALUMNI NAYAR* Chief Diplomatic Editor & Correspondent, The Telegraph 

It was Nayar who created the now commonly used narrative of Israel having provided India with indispensable help during the Kargil skirmish . Here is “alumni” puff piece Changes in neighbourhood for bomb-shelter land Israel    QUOTE It is not widely known that during the Kargil war in 1999, the French approved with lightning speed the adaptation of Indian Air Force Mirages in tandem with equally speedy Israeli supplies of laser-guided bombs which they delivered in Srinagar: without such French and Israeli support, India could have lost Kargil to Pervez Musharraf’s perfidy END QUOTE . Also See Why India chose Rafale

                                  CHIDANAND RAJGHATTA PROJECT INTERCHANGE 2011


alumni chidanand

Chidanand Rajghatta is an Indian-born journalist based in Washington, D.C. He is the present foreign editor and the United States correspondent for the Times of India.


                           SMITA PRAKASH PROJECT INTERCHANGE 2011


alumni prakash

Director, News, Asian News International She is the daughter or daughter in law of Prem Prakash founder of ANI one of the three leading News agencies in India ,the other two being PTI and UNI

                                        PAARULL MALHOTRA PROJECT INTERCHANGE 2011


alumni parul malhotra

* Chief Diplomatic Correspondent, CNN-IBN  This is her puff piece for the state of  Snapshots from Israel Paarull Malhotra is the chief diplomatic correspondent and an anchor with CNN-IBN.Spent a all expenses paid week in 2010 in Israel

                                       RUCHIKA KHANNA PROJECT INTERCHANGE 2011

alumni ruchika khanna

* Principal Correspondent, The Tribune She went to Israel in 2010 and in 2013 she had won a UK Government scholarship the Chevring Scholarship She has extensive experience concerning issues pertaining to agriculture economics, small scale industry, banking, services and real estate sector. Her investigative reporting on human trafficking in Haryana, have been widely followed by local and international media.

                        V SRINIVAS CHARY PROJECT INTERCHANGE 2011


ALUMNI Srinivas Chary*

* Dean of Research, Director, Centre for Public Policy & Governance, and Administrative Staff, College of India 


Posted in Uncategorized | 6 Comments



Paul Singer is a Jewish businessman who has been described as a “fundraising terrorist” for his persistence in successfully arm twisting Govts and companies across the world.

He buys Govt debt way below par taking advantage of political social or financial unrest Then he arm twists the Governments to repay the Bonds in full or at a premium

Paul Singer is known for pursuing his investments to the ends of the earth.

And since the beginning of June (2015) he has decided that he will no longer play nice with one of the richest families on the planet – South Korea’s Lee family – the family that, through its massive Samsung empire, controls 17% of their native country’s economy. Source

DAVOS/SWITZERLAND, 27JAN11 - Paul Singer, Principal, Elliott Management, USA and Co-Chair of the Governors Meeting for Investors 2011, speaks during the session 'Managing a

Paul Singer

 For three generations the Lee family has built a sprawling $270 billion empire of companies – not just electronics-maker Samsung. Its affiliate, holding company Cheil Industries, contains within it a bunch of businesses raging from textiles to entertainment.In South Korea this structure is known as a chaebol. It is a complex way of putting together a vast network under one main leader of one powerful family.

Singer in time honoured and long standing Jewish business tradition wants to buy out the holding company break up the Chaebol and sell of the parts for a huge profit and then just move on ………leaving the long standing business house and the brand name Samsung a mere shell

Naturally the Lee’s oppose having their massive business and proud name destroyed by a scheming jew So they’ve fought back with all of their  considerable power

But Singer has All Judaan  behind him The Jewish media presented the case rather differently See the July 2015 article in Forbes  Victory For Samsung Heirs, Blow For U.S. Hedge Fund — Yes Vote Solidifies Their Grip On Empire

Ever since Singers spat with Samsung All Judaan’s most powerful tool its media has been used  to snipe at Samsung and its products The media has always anyway sided with Apple in the Apple Samsung smart phone battle
Samsung phones vulnerable to cyber attacks because of software bug  ABC 17 June 2015 (This During Singers takeover bid ) Samsung TVs appear less energy efficient in real life than in tests Oct 1 Guardian Former workers pressure Samsung over deadly illnesses  Financial Times27-Oct-2015 Samsung’s smart fridge could be used to steal your Gmail login 24-Aug-2015 Fortune

But it was in 2016 that All Judaan really stuck back Samsung’s new successful Galaxt Note 7 suddenly faced the problem of “exploding batteries” In September 2016 Samsung recalled Galaxy Note 7 worldwide due to exploding battery fears”.  According to an unnamed Samsung official that spoke earlier to Yonhap, the vast majority of Note 7 phones should be unaffected, despite the sweeping recall. “Products installed with the problematic battery account for less than 0.1 percent of the entire volume sold,” said the official. “The problem can be simply resolved by changing the battery, but we’ll come up with convincing measures for our consumers.” Source CNET  The ((media)) however made out as if all the Note 7s were exploding on touch The batteries that cause the problems

Singer wanted Samsung to dish out a huge dividend of 26 billion  US dollars  from its reserves  In effect such a huge payout would destroy Samsung as it exists today

Its to be noted that during the Singer Lee dispute the entire gamut of Korean Government Financial Institutions threw their lot solidly behid the Lee family President Park Geun-hye, was South Korea’s president at that time

Korean Media however was perfectly aware of Singers tactics “Elliott and other hedge funds have a history of unscrupulous profiteering, whatever the cost,” said the English-language Korea Times in an editorial headlined, “Vote on vulture fund,” published the day before the shareholders’ meeting. The editorial alleged “Their usual strategy is to raise the stock price of a target firm even if it hurts its long-term interests, and then make a quick exit along with a large amount of profit” Source

The Jewish Media regularly targets only Samsung and its corrupt practices though all Chaebols engage in similar practices–

Nine chaebol chairmen that made “contributions” to the Mir and K-Sports Foundations are appearing on Dec. 6 before a special parliamentary audit committee to investigate allegations of government interference by Choi Sun-sil and other non-elected figures. A second-generation example of government-business collusion resulted in the largest number of top-ranked chaebol chairmen ending up at a hearing.–

Mr and K sports are the NGOs belonging to the Presidents friend which were allegedly used to channel funds to the Presidents friend (and the President)


Bloomberg admitted that the while other Chaebol heads are being questioned over the Presidential bribery scandal Samsung is also being investigated for bribing Public bodies which held shares in Samsung and backed the Lees against Singer in the Cheil Samsung CT merger which effectively locked out Singer from Samsung

In the case of Samsung, investigators have focused on whether the company made payments to win the backing of Korea’s national pension fund for a controversial merger between Samsung affiliates. The deal, involving Cheil Industries Inc. and Samsung C&T Corp., was approved in 2015 and made it easier for Lee to gain influence over the sprawling conglomerate.

Prosecutors this week indicted Moon Hyungpyo, former chairman of the pension service, for perjury and abusing his authority. Moon acknowledged that he pressured NPS officials to support the Samsung merger, investigators said last month. Bloomberg

The special prosecutor’s office has focused on Samsung Group’s relationship with Park, accusing Lee in his capacity as the head of South Korea’s largest conglomerate of pledging 43 billion won($37.7 million) to a business and organizations backed by Park’s friend, Choi Soon-sil, in exchange for support of a 2015 merger of two Samsung companies.Reuters


The Supreme Prosecutors’ Office of the Republic of Korea (SPO) is a governmental prosecutor organization in South Korea and is run under the Ministry of Justice. 47.1% of South Koreans surveyed in 2009 didn’t think positively of the Supreme Prosecutors’ Office and the credibility was scored low at 4 out of 10. Overall general consensus amongst the Korean media rates the Prosecutors’ Office of the Republic of Korea as having very low credibility.

The Special Prosecutors are susceptible to bribes and blackmail

Since June 2015 Samsung and its “Crown Prince” Lee Jae-yong also known as Jay Lee have faced a series of strange problems .Lee is rarely seen in public and avoids publicity. He has three younger sisters, Lee Boo-jin, Lee Seo-hyun and Lee Yoon-hyung  who committed suicide in 2005 aged 26 Lee has two children and is divorced

On 17 February 2017 Lee was arrested

The charge of bribery against the public officials for receiving bribes to support the Cheil Samsung CT merger seems to be with the intention of nullifying the merger

If that happens with Lee in jail Singer and his Korean stooges could make a second attempt and break up Samsung according to Singers plan

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment